CCTV-8CH-Full-D1-H-264-DVR-Standalone-Network-Super-DVR-SDVR-HVR-NVR-Security-System.jpg' alt='Super Net Surveillance Dvr To Dvd' title='Super Net Surveillance Dvr To Dvd' />Telecoms Pay for Totally Shocking Analysis of Net Neutrality Comments. Today is the last day to submit comments on the proposal to kill open internet rules to the Federal Communications Commission FCC. Good luck with that, though. The public comment period has been complete disaster from the start, and a new study funded by big telecom suggests that the record setting 2. Spy Camera in Delhi India Buy online Audio Video recording night vision Wireless Hidden micro Cameras from our Shop for sting operation at best price. Super Mario 64 was released in 1996 as a singleplayer video game. Recent mods have let two people play together, but a new romhack allows up to 24 to jump online and. Samsung SRD1673D 960H 16 channel DVR Digital Video Recorder delivers the perfect highend Linux DVR system for 700TVL security cameras and 960H higher CCTV resolution. The report in question comes from Emprata LLC, a DC based data research company, and was paid for by Broadband for America, a big telecom lobbying group. That second detail is important, since the report ultimately claims that a larger proportion of the comments from verifiable addresses were in favor of repealing the open internet rules. On the flip side, Emprata found the vast majority of comments both for and against repealing the FCCs open internet rules consisted of form letters, with many coming from seemingly fake email addresses. These findings suggest that the protest against repeal is driven by bots and that more actual humans want the open internet rules repealed. Which certainly sounds like a conclusion that big telecom lobbyists would love. Weve also seen evidence of the opposite being true. It would be convenient for net neutrality advocates if the story was as simple as that. But as even the study itself admits, its very difficult to draw any definitive conclusions from the comments found in the docket. And its the FCCs fault. The agonizing wait is finally over. Today, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his plan to dismantleRead more Read. The crux of the problem is the fact that the FCCs Electronic Comment Filing System ECFS has no way of authenticating individual users or comments. Thats why you had so many duplicate comments, comments from disposable email addresses, and comments that were just form letters from activist groups. Because any human or bot can simply fill out a form on the FCCs website and submit a comment, its almost impossible to tell which of these comments are genuine, to use Empratas word. And so, as with any large data set, there are a lot of different ways to look at the 2. FCC. Taken at face value, over 1. August 2. 2, when the Emprata study pulled the data, and a little over 8. If you scrape away the duplicates, those numbers whittle down to 1. That means that some 9. Still, 1. 7 million to 2. Emprata did find a way to reverse that conclusion, claiming that more commenters favored repeal, by looking exclusively at comments with completely filled out email and home address forms. That feels like the researchers just adjusted their parameters to prove a conclusion, however. And other research has already shown that an anti net neutrality bot has filed tens of thousands of comments in favor of repealing the rules by using unsuspecting Americans email and home addresses. John Oliver even did a whole segment about it. So who knows what to believe. The evidence that anti net neutrality bots were posting fake comments back in May was bookended by claims that the FCC was hit with a cyberattack that led to more than 1. The FCCs chief information officer even claimed in secret internal documents that the commissions servers fell victim to multiple distributed denial of service attacks. Two months later, the FCC reversed its position and insisted that such documents didnt exist. But clearly something was askew. Windows Xp Sp2 Iso Image 32 Bit. What we do know is that many Americans do want open internet rules. If you look back to the initial battle to pass these open internet rules a few years ago, its easy to see that theres fervent public support for net neutrality. Some 4 million people filed comments regarding those rules and actually broke the FCCs website, though that record has obviously since been broken by the current fight against repealing the rules. A Sunlight Foundation study in 2. While one could argue that a nonprofit focused on open government could provide a biased analysis, its really tough to argue that the tables have turned so drastically in the past three years that the majority of Americans now oppose net neutralityespecially when a study funded by big telecom is suggesting you do so. Theres also behavior from the FCC as well as big telecom companies that makes the public support for net neutrality seem irrelevant. In May, Trump appointed FCC chairman Ajit Pai said publicly that no numerical threshold was going to going to sway his plans to take a weed whacker to the open internet rules passed under Obamas FCC. Pai has also attacked pro net neutrality groups like Free Press and complained about a larger movement against free speech that stands to affect outlets like the Drudge Report. How that has anything to do with preventing internet service providers from throttling or blocking content is unclear. MTIwMFgxMjAw/z/1-kAAOSwT6pVrJHU/$_1.JPG' alt='Super Net Surveillance Dvr To Dvd' title='Super Net Surveillance Dvr To Dvd' />It is, however, clear that the current FCC chair cares less about the publics opinion on net neutrality and more about the disparate political interests of special interest groups. The Trump White House approves of Pais plan, and telecom companies like Verizon are already starting to throttle content, knowing that regulatory action from the FCC is unlikely. Sucks. A federal court dealt a deadly blow to net neutrality on Tuesday by striking down the FCCsRead more Read. So, if you care about net neutrality, you still have a few hours to submit comments to the FCC. The commissions chairman probably wont read it or generally care about what the public has to say. You can also vote in the next election. While the FCC is supposed to be a nonpartisan commission focused on doing whats best for the United States, weve seen the agency morph into a gnarly beast of a political machine in recent years. That means when youre voting for your next president, youre also voting for the next FCC commissioner who will tug the strings of regulations that dictate how the internet will work for the foreseeable future. Its not a perfect system. Its a clusterfuck, in fact. But at least we still have some semblance of a democracy in America. Just a little bit. Q See CCTV DVR System Not as cool as it could be Amal Graafstra. Weve had some issues with home security recently, so before anything serious happens I bought a Q See QSD2. C1. 6 5. 00 DVR from Costco. The system is a network DVR setup that comes with 1. The whole reason I looked into buying this setup is that it was cheap. It was a pretty good deal since the cameras run about 5. Hooking up the system and using the onscreen menu was fairly easy. The problem I have with this network DVR is the direction Q See went with their network interface design and software development. When it comes to network connected video devices, Im used to the concept of streaming. Im used to IP video cameras that streaming technologies like MJPEG and MPEG. While the QSD2. 31. C1. 6 5. 00 DVR locally records analog video using the H. The DVR does have a web interface, but it is simply is a launchpad for an Active. X component. This limits you to accessing the DVR via a Windows PC running Internet Explorer. Furthermore, the Active. X component is highly unstable. It crashes on all but a couple of my several PCs I have around 1. I use at any given time. They also have mobile options if you are running a phonePDA with Windows Mobile or Symbian OS, but alas I have a Black. Berry so my options for mobile monitoring are nonexistent. After some Googling and poking around on the DVRs web interface really its just web launched software app, I determined I couldnt even pull a live static JPG snapshot from any of the cameras, let alone get a decent video stream. I called Q See tech support to find out if there was a developer toolkit or SDK or even just some documentation on how the DVRs network interface worked, but got shutdown immediately. There is no SDK, and in no way did they want to help me figure out if what I was after was even possible. Their approach to software is very confusing to me, being they are a hardware manufacturer that makes money selling hardware, not software. Why not focus on the internal software menus, features, etc. I found the Contact a Manager section on their website and wrote the following I want Q See to open up documentation for the DVR command and video streaming methods. That, or introduce standard web streaming technologies like MJPEG or MPEG video streams, and utilize those streaming technologies via a standardized web interface. This Active. X component is ridiculously limiting, and very unstable. I can only get it and the CMS to work properly on one out of 5 computers. At the very minimum, an SDK would be nice so a guy could create a proper web streaming server. If this is something Q See management would like to discuss in further detail, Im always available with an opinion. I really dont get why they didnt create a standard web interface in the first place. I would think it would capture more market share and cost less to dev and support than a wonky Active. X component. I wonder what their response will be, if any. This entry was posted. Monday, May 1. 1th, 2. Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.